• Skip to main content
  • Skip to secondary menu
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Home
  • DOPT ORDERS 2020
  • FinMin Orders 2020
  • Railway Orders 2020
  • Contact Us

7th Pay Commission Latest news

Central Government Employees News

  • DOPPW Orders
  • 7th Pay Commission
  • Dearness Allowance
  • Dearness Relief
  • CSD Price List
  • Defence
    • Defence Pension
You are here: Home / Central Government Employees News / DOPT-Recovery of wrongful / excess payments made to Government servants.

DOPT-Recovery of wrongful / excess payments made to Government servants.

March 2, 2016 pcadmin Leave a Comment

DOPT – Recovery of wrongful / excess payments made to Government servants.

F.No. 1 8/03/20 1 5-Estt. (Pay-I)
Government of India
Ministry of Personnel, Public Grievances & Pensions
Department of Personnel & Training
                                                                                                                                          New Delhi, the 2nd March, 2016

OFFICE MEMORANDUM
Sub: Recovery of wrongful / excess payments made to Government servants.

The undersigned is directed to refer to this Department’s OM No.18/26/2011-Estt (Pay-I) dated 6th February, 2014 wherein certain instructions have been issued to deal with the issue of recovery of wrongful / excess payments made to Government servants in view of the law declared by Courts, particularly, in the case of Chandi Prasad Uniyal And
Ors. vs. State of Uttarakhand And Ors., 2012 AIR SCW 4742, (2012) 8 SCC 417. Para 3(iv) of the OM inter-alia provides that recovery should be made in all cases of overpayment barring few exceptions of extreme hardships.

2. The issue has subsequently come up for consideration before the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of State of Punjab & Ors vs Rafiq Masih (White Washer) etc in CA No.11527 of 2014 (Arising out of SLP(C) No.11684 of 2012) wherein Hon’ble Court on 18.12.2014 decided a bunch of cases in which monetary benefits were given to employees in excess of their entitlement due to unintentional mistakes committed by the concerned competent authorities, in determining the emoluments payable to them, and the employees were not guilty of furnishing any incorrect information / misrepresentation / fraud, which had led the concerned competent authorities to commit the mistake of making the higher payment to the employees. The employees were as innocent as their employers in the wrongful determination of their inflated emoluments. The Hon’ble Supreme Court in its judgment dated 18 th December, 2014 ibid has, inter-alia, observed as under:

                              “7. Having examined a number of judgments rendered by this Court, we are of the view, that orders passed by the employer seeking recovery of monetary benefits wrongly extended to employees, can only be interfered with, in cases where such recovery would result in a hardship of a nature, which would far outweigh, the equitable balance of the employer’s right to recover. In other words, interference would be called for, only in such cases where, it would be iniquitous to recover the payment made. In order to ascertain the parameters of the above consideration, and the test to be applied, reference needs to be made to situations when this Court exempted employees from such recovery, even in exercise of its jurisdiction under Article 142 of the Constitution of India. Repeated exercise of such power, “for doing complete justice in any cause” would establish that the recovery being effected was iniquitous, and therefore, arbitrary. And accordingly, the interference at the hands of this Court.”

“10. In view of the afore-stated constitutional mandate, equity and good conscience, in the matter of livelihood of the people of this country, has to be the basis of all governmental actions. An action of the State, ordering a recovery
from an employee, would be in order, so long as it is not rendered iniquitous to the extent, that the action of recovery would be more unfair, more wrongful, more improper, and more unwarranted, than the corresponding right of the
employer, to recover the amount. Or in other words, till such time as the recovery would have a harsh and arbitrary effect on the employee, it would be permissible in law. Orders passed in given situations repeatedly, even in
exercise of the power vested in this Court under Article 142 of the Constitution of India, will disclose the parameters of the realm of an action of recovery (of an excess amount paid to an employee) which would breach the obligations of the State, to citizens of this country, and render the action arbitrary, and therefore, violative of the mandate contained in Article 14 of the Constitution of India.”

3. The issue that was required to be adjudicated by the Hon’ble Supreme Court was whether all the private respondents, against whom an order-of recovery (of the excess amount) has been made, should be exempted in law, from the reimbursement of the same to the employer. For the applicability of the instant order, and the conclusions recorded by them thereinafter, the ingredients depicted in paras 2&3 of the judgment are essentially indispensable.

4. The Hon’ble Supreme Court while observing that it is not possible to postulate all situations of hardship which would govern employees on the issue of recovery, where payments have mistakenly been made by the employer, in excess of their entitlement has summarized the following few situations, wherein recoveries by the employers would be impermissible in law:-

(i) Recovery from employees belonging to Class-III and Class-IV service (or Group ‘C’ and Group ‘D’ service).
(ii) Recovery from retired employees, or employees who are due to retire within one year, of the order of recovery.
(iii) Recovery from employees, when the excess payment has been made for a period in excess of five years, before the order of recovery is issued.
(iv) Recovery in cases where an employee has wrongfully been required to discharge duties of a higher post, and has been paid accordingly, even though he should have rightfully been required to work against an inferior
post.
(v) In any other case, where the Court arrives at the conclusion, that recovery if made from the employee, would be iniquitous or harsh or arbitrary to such an extent, as would far outweigh the equitable balance of the employer’s
right to recover.

5. The matter has, consequently, been examined in consultation with the Department of Expenditure and the Department of Legal Affairs. The Ministries / Departments are advised to deal with the issue of wrongful / excess payments made to Government servants in accordance with above decision of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in CA
No.11527 of 2014 (arising out of SLP (C) No.11684 of 2012) in State of Punjab and others etc vs Rafiq Masih (White Washer) etc. However, wherever the waiver of recovery in the above-mentioned situations is considered, the same may be allowed with the express approval of Department of Expenditure in terms of this Department’s OM No.18/26/2011-Estt (Pay-I) dated 6th February, 2014.

6. In so far as persons serving in the Indian Audit and Accounts Department are concerned, these orders are issued with the concurrence of the Comptroller and Auditor General of India.

7. Hindi version will follow.

(A.K. Jain)
Deputy Secretary to the Government of India

1. All Ministries / Departments of Government of India

2. NIC, DOP&T — with a request to upload this OM on the Department’s website under OMs & Orders (Establishment —> Pay Rules) and also under “What is New”.

Copy also forwarded to:
1. The Comptroller & Auditor General of India.
2. Secretary General, Supreme Court of India.
3. Controller General of Accounts / Controller of Accounts, Ministry of Finance.
4. Union Public Service Commission / Lok Sabha Sectt. / Rajya Sabha Sectt. /
Cabinet Sectt. /Central Vigilance Commission / President’s Sectt ./ VicePresident’s
Sectt. / Prime Minister’s Office / Niti Aayog.
5. Governments of all States and Union Territories.
6. Department of Personnel and Training (AIS Division) / JCA /Admn. Section.
7. Secretary, National Council of JCM (Staff Side), 13-C, Feroz Shah Road, New
Delhi.
8. All Members of Staff Side of the National Council of JCM / Departmental
Council.
9. All Officers / Sections of Department of Personnel and Training / Department of
Administrative Reforms & Public Grievances / Department of Pensions &
Pensioners’ Welfare / PESB.
10. Joint Secretary (Pers), Department of Expenditure, Ministry of Finance.
11. Additional Secretary (Union Territories), Ministry of Home Affairs.

original link

Filed Under: Central Government Employees News, DOPT Orders 2016

Also Read

Union Budget 2023 : Live Updates

Union Budget 2023 : Live Updates

February 1, 2023 By pcadmin Leave a Comment

Union Budget 2023 : Live Updates 𝐓𝐡𝐢𝐬 𝐢𝐬 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐟𝐢𝐫𝐬𝐭 𝐛𝐮𝐝𝐠𝐞𝐭 𝐢𝐧 𝐀𝐦𝐫𝐢𝐭 𝐊𝐚𝐚𝐥. Budget focuses on 7 priorities, ‘saptrishi guiding us through Amrit Kaal’ This budget hopes to build on the foundation laid in the previous budget and the blueprint drawn at India at 100. … [Read More...] about Union Budget 2023 : Live Updates

AICPIN for the month of December 2022

AICPIN for the month of December 2022

February 1, 2023 By pcadmin Leave a Comment

AICPIN for the month of December 2022 Consumer Price Index for Industrial Workers for December, 2022 The Labour Bureau, an attached office of the Ministry of Labour & Employment, has been compiling Consumer Price Index for Industrial Workers every month on the basis of retail prices … [Read More...] about AICPIN for the month of December 2022

One Rank One Pension to the Defence Forces Pensioners. orop

One Rank One Pension to the Defence Forces Pensioners.

January 24, 2023 By pcadmin Leave a Comment

One Rank One Pension to the Defence Forces Pensioners. No. 1(1)/2019/D(Pen/Pol)/Vol-IIGovernment of IndiaMinistry of DefenceDepartment of Ex-Servicemen Welfare New Delhi, Dated: 20th January 2023 ToThe Chief of the Defence StaffThe Chief of the Army StaffThe Chief of the Naval StaffThe … [Read More...] about One Rank One Pension to the Defence Forces Pensioners.

Addendum for early closure of all the offices falling in the premises of Parliament House & Rashtrapati Bhawan in c/w forthcoming Republic Day

Addendum for early closure of all the offices falling in the premises of Parliament House & Rashtrapati Bhawan in c/w forthcoming Republic Day

January 23, 2023 By pcadmin Leave a Comment

Addendum for early closure of all the offices falling in the premises of Parliament House & Rashtrapati Bhawan in c/w forthcoming Republic Day No.16/3/2023-JCAGovernment of IndiaMinistry of Personnel Public Grievances and Pensions(Department of Personnel and Training)Establishment (JCA) … [Read More...] about Addendum for early closure of all the offices falling in the premises of Parliament House & Rashtrapati Bhawan in c/w forthcoming Republic Day

Linking of CGHS Beneficiary ID with the ABHA ID

Linking of CGHS Beneficiary ID with the ABHA ID

January 20, 2023 By pcadmin Leave a Comment

Linking of CGHS Beneficiary ID with the ABHA ID F.No. 44/67/MCTC/CGHSGovernment of IndiaMinistry of Health & Family WelfareDepartment of Health & Family Welfare Nirman Bhawan, New DelhiDated the January, 2023 OFFICE MEMORANDUM SUBJECT: Linking of CGHS Beneficiary ID with the ABHA … [Read More...] about Linking of CGHS Beneficiary ID with the ABHA ID

Reader Interactions

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Primary Sidebar

All About Pension

All about Pension

Latest DOPT Orders

Addendum for early closure of all the offices falling in the premises of Parliament House & Rashtrapati Bhawan in c/w forthcoming Republic Day

Early Closure of Offices in connection with Republic Day Parade/Beating Retreat Ceremony/At Home Function during January, 2023

Review of CSS Officers (Under Secretary) under FR 56(j) and Rule 48 of CCS (Pension) Rules, 1972

Year-End- Review of DoPT(Ministry of Personnel, Public Grievances & Pensions)-2022

Extension of the LTC block year 2018-21 (extended) for a period of three months

Latest Finmin Orders

Compendium of Instructions regarding grant of House Rent Allowance to Central Government employees – FINMIN

CGEGIS 1980: Table of Benefits of saving funds from Oct to Dec 2022

Non-Productivity Linked Bonus (ad-hoc bonus) to Central Government Employees for 2021-22

FINMIN : Dearness Allowance to Central Government employees effective from 01.07.2022.

Compendium of Instructions regarding grant of Transport Allowance at double the normal rates to persons with disabilities employed in Central Government

Latest Railway Orders

Implementation of Railway Services (Revised Pay) Rules, 2016

Computer Advance Interest Rate 2022-23 for Railway Employees

Eligibility of married disabled child for family pension – Railway Board order

Grant of Leave to Probationary officers: Railway Board

Productivity Linked Bonus to all eligible non-gazetted Railway employees for 2020-2021

Categories

Copyright © 2023